Should Women Feel Threatened by AI Girlfriends and Dolls?
- benji773
- Nov 26, 2025
- 4 min read

I’ve been in the doll industry for five years and I run a small showroom in New York City. I meet everybody. Blue collar, white collar, guys in relationships, guys who’ve checked out of the dating market, even a former college football player over six feet tall with a girlfriend who was curious and wanted to try one as he didn't live with her yet. The stereotype about who buys is outdated. The tech and the use cases have changed.
Let's start with AI girlfriends. A few years ago it was mostly chat apps. Now you can customize a photoreal girlfriend that talks back, remembers you, roleplays, and syncs across phone, desktop, and soon your living room. Pair that with VR and the experience stops feeling like “content” and starts feeling present. First time I tried a VR headset with adult content, the spatial audio tricked my brain so hard it felt like a woman was breathing into my ear. I kept grabbing for her in the air desperately trying to squeeze her titties. The missing piece was touch.
That’s where hardware closes the loop. A doll torso on the bed or mounting your lap while the headset is on gives you tactile realism that lines up with what your eyes and ears are processing. Haptics do the rest. It goes from “watching” to “being there.”
What about robotics today versus near future? Right now you can get breathing mechanisms, hip motion, tongue motion, and heating. Some companies also sell animatronic talking heads that move and speak. They’re impressive but expensive and you hear gears cranking with every facial move. You also give up a few things because that mouth is doing mouth-things mechanically. Forget about oral with a talking head. If you dare to stick your schlong in that moving mouth, be prepared for a bloody mess afterwards. OUCH!! A lot of guys end up preferring a simple AI voice pendant around the doll’s neck. You talk, she talks back in natural voice, no motors whining, and the face stays free for whatever you want to prioritize. Legs and full-body movement aren’t there yet, but repositioning and basic autonomous motion are coming in the next few years. Give it a decade and the average consumer unit will cook, clean, handle routine housework, and provide companionship and sex. It will do everything except carry a child. If artificial wombs ever become practical, that last moat goes too.
Is this a threat to women or just a pressure release valve for men? Depends which women and which men. Some men will always prefer the hunt and the chaos of dating. Others have tried for years, got soul-crushed by constant rejection, and read the subtext loud and clear: you aren’t good enough to reproduce. That message breaks men. Those guys aren’t suddenly going to become social butterflies, but they can now opt into a life with intimacy, warmth, and regular release without begging for it. I also see men in relationships who live apart from their girlfriends or go through dry spells. Instead of cheating, they keep a doll. It calms them down, reduces the pressure on the relationship, and they show up more relaxed.
Some Women say “this is objectification.” Let’s be precise. Objectification of women means taking a human being and treating her as a thing. AI and silicone do the opposite. We take a thing and try to make it humanlike. No person is being dehumanized. There’s no victim when a man is with software and rubber in his own home. If anything, feminists who worry about exploitation in porn should be the first to champion AI porn and synthetic companions, because it removes harm from the pipeline. You may not like that men can get what they want without female approval, but that isn’t the same as harm.
Will men stop chasing? Some will chase less. When men have options they aren’t as desperate, and that shifts the negotiating power. On dating apps most women filter for the same 10 to 20 percent of men. That’s been the game for a while. But chads don’t stay chads forever, and the next generation of high-status men grew up digital. A lot of them will quietly use dolls and AI when it’s convenient. Put any man alone with a top-tier unit long enough and curiosity does work. Once you normalize the experience, it’s like online dating. People mocked it, then it became standard. The same arc is coming here.
Will this replace the entire porn industry? Not all of it, but AI will eat a big chunk. I’d bet something like 80 percent of what men consume visually can be done better, cheaper, safer, and more personalized by AI. The remaining organic performers will still have demand, but the long tail gets hollowed out. So basically it's safe to say that Only Fan's will be reduced to the top 20% of women and the rest will fade away due to AI replacements.
What about women getting male dolls or AI boyfriends? Some will. Women absolutely value conversation and emotional contact, so AI companions make sense for them too. But the male sexual value proposition is different. He is a provider, a challenge, a status signal, a chooser. A synthetic boyfriend doesn’t earn money, doesn’t select her, doesn’t have scarce attention. He’s easy. That kills half the thrill. This is why the female market will skew toward chat-first emotional AI and occasional toys, while the male market goes all-in on embodied, visual, tactile immersion.
Now zoom out. If most men can satisfy touch, novelty, and release on demand at home, the dating market resets. Men negotiate with their feet. They’ll say no to bad deals more often. Fewer thirst traps work. First dates get calmer. The guys who still want marriage will be pickier and slower, because they can afford to be. The guys who never had a chance finally get peace. Women won’t be replaced, but the leverage changes because access to sex and affection is no longer monopolized.
If you’re a woman reading this, should you feel threatened? I think you should feel challenged but not threatened. Bad behavior from men will find an outlet that doesn’t involve you. Good women with good offers will still win. But the old leverage is fading.




Comments